Re: Shakuhachi vs Hocchiku; Suizen vs Music

From: Peter Ross (peteross@cloudhandsmusic.com)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 20:54:24 PST


>Hi Riley,

I agree completely with you. In addition I feel that this subject of
which type of flute is more "spiritual" only comes up with American
shakuhachi players who often tend to be much too serious and try to
either project our new-age concept of spirituality onto the Japanese
tradition and/or try to "out-spiritual" each other. What a waste of
time. We should all lighten up. Especially since the world is on
the brink of disaster. As Kenny Werner says in "Effortless Mastery",
"if you think music (or shakuhachi-my addition) is the most important
thing in life, put a plastic bag over your head and start counting.
By the time you reach 6o air becomes the most important thing in
life.

Peter

>Happy New Year!
>
>Well not quite, but soon - February 1 brings in the Year of the Goat!
>
>During the holidays, I've enjoyed going through past discussions on
>this list. I felt compelled to reply to one thread. It's partly to
>do with spirituality, which, according to the introduction to
>recently posted questionaire, is of particular interest to
>shakuhachi players outside of Japan.
>
>In some of the discussions about shakuhachi/hochiku/hoki, etc.,
>there seems to be some confusion between music making and spiritual
>practice/blowing Zen (suizen).
>
>Nothing new here, as this confusion has been in Japan and elsewhere
>long before we shakuhachi list people came on the scene.
>
>Here is, in my opinion, one example of this confusion.
>There seems to be the idea that the meditative/spiritual endeavour
>of a person playing one type of instrument, eg, a shakuhachi, is
>somehow more or less valuable than that of one playing another type
>of instrument, eg, a hochiku or hocchiku.
>
>A belief that the nature of one's instrument defines one's spiritual
>experience is, to me, as absurb as believing that doing meditation
>in, for example, a temple (built specifically for the purpose) is by
>definition, and always will be, 'better' than doing meditation, for
>example, at home (built for other purposes). Sometimes this may be
>true, but not because of the buildings themselves.
>
>Some instruments might be more condusive to meditation, just as some
>buildings are more condusive to meditation. But no material 'thing'
>exists that is more or less inately spiritual than any other 'thing'.
>
>I would take it one step further: to think that a hochiku is
>particularly more spiritual than a regular shakuhachi, or an
>electric guitar, or any other musical instrument, is risking
>mistaking the plate for the food.
>
>I appreciate the pleasure of making and playing simple bamboo
>flutes, hochiku or otherwise. I also respect and acknowledge the
>challenges these instruments present to their players. I know that
>often a challenging instrument can make for a great performance, eg,
>the recording recently mentioned on the list, of Choshi played on a
>quickly and roughly made flute.
>
>However....
>
>If "the main difference between a shakuhachi and a hochiku is the
>philosophy behind the two instruments," and, if one plays a
>shakuhachi with the same PHILOSOPHICAL attitude as when one plays a
>hochiku, then where is the difference? There may have been a
>difference in attitude during the making of the instrument, but we
>are talking here about playing the bamboo, not making the flute.
>
>For example, imagine (it's not hard!) someone who practices 'blowing
>Zen' for years on what s/he thinks is a really good hochiku, made in
>the spirit of the hochiku. But actually the flute is really just a
>badly made shakuhachi. Or imagine that the person knows that the
>flute wasn't made as a hochiku, but, doesn't care how the flute was
>made; s/he just wants to do 'blowing Zen'.
>
>So, for argument's sake, this shakuhachi wasn't made in the 'spirit'
>of a hochiku, but rather by someone who had never even heard of the
>hochiku tradition, and who just wasn't very skilled at making
>shakuhachi. The flute can't play dai kan; the sound disappears with
>all but a small volume of air; it is so out of tune that it can't
>easily play pitches based on natural laws of physics (such as
>octaves); it can't be played together with other folks, etc. It
>requires a gentle, controlled breath to make it work. This could be
>a description of a hochiku, but it isn't. It's just a difficult
>shakuhachi. In any case, the player thinks that this shakuhachi,
>even though it isn't a hochiku, does very nicely when 'blowing Zen'.
>
>What is the difference between the person using this instrument and
>another person who practices 'blowing Zen' on an 'authentic' hochiku
>made by a maker who is very much into the 'hochiku' tradition?
>
>In my opinion, sometimes discussions of differences between hochiku
>and shakuhachi might be unconscious attempts at placing a high value
>on one thing at the expense of other things. Generally speaking,
>value judgments are counterproductive in meditative practice.
>
>Also, think a moment about the idea that it is very important to
>hear hochiku live. We are told this is so because much of the tone
>colour is lost on CDs. This may be true, but how does this differ
>from regular shakuhachi, or any other musical instrument?
>
>[By the way, someone on this list last year asked/lamented how he
>could ever sound like a performer whose CD he recently listened to.
>Do not despair. From my limited experience, it is amazing what magic
>can occur in recording studios. Just try playing in a large concrete
>stairwell to get an idea of this. A good recording engineer can
>improve anybody's sound even more than a good stairwell can!]
>
>If the point of playing hochiku is to do blowing Zen, then the
>question is: Why would someone want to listen to 'blowing Zen'
>anyway, live or recorded? That would be like watching someone
>meditating. I suppose that doing so can be a calming, meditative
>experience, and if it helps one meditate, then that's great.
>
>One could argue that listening to a teacher play his/her hochiku
>helps one become better at playing one's own hochiku. But then one
>is now talking about music making, not about spiritual practice. In
>general, you don't get very good at meditating by watching someone
>else play a flute.
>
>It can be meditative watching people meditate, but likewise, it can
>be meditative listening to music. Observing spiritual practice isn't
>very rewarding as a spectator activity. Listening to music however,
>is.
>
>Here is my main point:
>
>With spiritual practice, it DOES NOT matter what sort of bamboo
>flute you blow into, and really it might be just as well if you
>threw all of your pieces of bamboo away as just more distraction,
>and got on with meditating.
>
>Music making can be spiritual practice, and spritual practice can
>include the making of music. They are, nevertheless, two distinct
>activities. They work under different rules. Confusing the two can
>result both in bad music and ineffective spiritual practice.
>
>Best regards, Riley
>
>Dr. Riley Lee
>PO Box 939
>Manly 1655 NSW Australia
>Tel: +61 (0)2 9976 6904
>Fax: +61 (0)2 9976 6905
>mobile: +61 (0)414 626 453
>www.rileylee.net
>
>____________________________________________________
>
><a hrefttp://communication.ucsd.edu:88/guest/RemoteListSummary/shakuhachi">

-- 
Peter Ross
http://www.cloudhandsmusic.com
P.O. Box 55055
Seattle, WA 98155
206-587-7262
206-364-2341  FAX
____________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 06 2004 - 14:09:32 PST