Re: [Shaku] Size

From: Tim Cassler (tim@toolbox.net)
Date: Wed Jan 14 2004 - 14:10:01 PST


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--B_3156941401_279073

my 2 cents (and my humble opinion) is a 2.4.

Monty has some nice ones. I auditioned one and it played nicely. Ken LaCosse
has a couple nice looking ones on his site also.
http://members.aol.com/emptyflute/instock.html

-- 

Tim Cassler Toolbox Studios, Inc. 454 Soledad, Suite 100 San Antonio, TX 78205

210.225.8269 x111 fax.225.8200

> From: Feadog@aol.com > Reply-To: Shakuhachi@communication.ucsd.edu > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:04:25 EST > To: Shakuhachi@communication.ucsd.edu > Subject: [Shaku] Size > > > Hi, > > I'm considering getting a different size/key shakuhachi, i.e., different from > the 1.8. I want to a lower pitch. I'm looking for a good, resonant sound > (aren't we all), and don't care about the key. A different way to ask the > question is, what's the most popular size, after the 1.8? I think that once I > have the size, e.g., 2.4, I need to try some to find the timbre I'm looking > for. > > Bill > >

--B_3156941401_279073

<HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: [Shaku] Size</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <FONT FACE=3D"Verdana">my 2 cents (and my humble opinion) is a 2.4.<BR> <BR> Monty has some nice ones. I auditioned one and it played nicely. Ken LaCoss= e has a couple nice looking ones &nbsp;on his site also. http://members.aol.= com/emptyflute/instock.html<BR> <BR> -- <BR> <BR> Tim Cassler<BR> Toolbox Studios, Inc.<BR> 454 Soledad, Suite 100<BR> San Antonio, TX 78205<BR> <BR> 210.225.8269 x111<BR> fax.225.8200<BR> </FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana"><BR> <B>From: </B>Feadog@aol.com<BR> <B>Reply-To: </B>Shakuhachi@communication.ucsd.edu<BR> <B>Date: </B>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:04:25 EST<BR> <B>To: </B>Shakuhachi@communication.ucsd.edu<BR> <B>Subject: </B>[Shaku] Size<BR> <BR> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana"><BR> </FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana">Hi,<BR> &nbsp;<BR> I'm considering getting a different size/key shakuhachi, i.e., different fr= om the 1.8. I want to a lower pitch. I'm looking for a good, resonant sound = (aren't we all), and don't care about the key. A different way to ask the qu= estion is, what's the most popular size, after the 1.8? I think that once I = have the size, e.g., 2.4, I need to try some to find the timbre I'm looking = for.<BR> &nbsp;<BR> Bill<BR> <BR> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Verdana"><BR> </FONT> </BODY> </HTML>

--B_3156941401_279073--

_____________________________________________

List subscription information is at: http://communication.ucsd.edu/shaku/listsub.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2005 - 15:42:31 PST