Re: [Shaku] Re: shakuhachi V1 #1283

From: Kelvin Falconer <falconer@enternet.co.nz>
Date: Wed Sep 02 2009 - 13:06:51 PDT

A long shot here, but at the Sydney Festival Stan Richardson explained
some details regarding numbering in "Nesting Cranes".
Perhaps he can add to this one.

Kel.

On 3/09/2009, at 3:36 AM, Justin . wrote:

> Hi Glen
>
> --- On Wed, 9/2/09, Glen swann <caine2323@yahoo.com> wrote:
> but as to why a variant
>> order existed he didn't know.
>
> I also don't know. It is interesting that it is no longer used
> though, and I think this tells us something, and may relate to the
> context of the time they were used in. Some of the Kinko-ryu pieces
> are already very long, and the number system can make them a lot
> longer. This doesn't make sense from the perspective of performance
> (too boring for the audience!). So this may point us more in the
> direction of spiritual practice as a reason, where added length
> might be wanted, for longer "sessions" or perhaps to explore the
> piece more deeply. Just a thought. If anyone else knows any reasons
> I would be interested to hear any.
>
> Justin Senryu
> http://senryushakuhachi.com/
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________
>
> List un/subscription information is at:
> http://mail.communication.ucsd.edu:9090/guest/RemoteListSummary/shakuhachi

_____________________________________________

List un/subscription information is at:
http://mail.communication.ucsd.edu:9090/guest/RemoteListSummary/shakuhachi
Received on Wed Sep 2 14:10:19 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 02 2011 - 10:53:37 PDT